<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Unplugged!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://serendipitypatchwork.com.au/blog/2006/10/31/more-unplugged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://serendipitypatchwork.com.au/blog/2006/10/31/more-unplugged/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A New Dawn : Serendipity and the Art of the Quilt</title>
		<link>http://serendipitypatchwork.com.au/blog/2006/10/31/more-unplugged/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>A New Dawn : Serendipity and the Art of the Quilt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>[...] I won&#8217;t give you a blow-by-blow analysis of my time-keeping results to date. Suffice to say that, quite predictably, actual quilting time has been minimal and then not especially productive. For example, believe it or not, this is all I have to show for 7+hours of quilting on Sunrise-Sunset:  Whereas for Unplugged! I used quilted the lines with a free-motion quilting foot with the feed dogs up, for this quilt I am using the walking foot as I am looking for straighter lines. It has worked well in the centre where there are longer lines of quilting, although I could have perhaps saved myself the bother and just used corduroy for the piecing:  The hatching in the background is less successfully executed. As Lisa Call points out, stopping and turning corners is a painstaking process. It would be easier if my machine had a better &#8220;backwards&#8221; mode. However, the stitch formation when going &#8220;backwards&#8221; is not as tidy and I can&#8217;t see where I am going as the bulk of the walking foot attachment gets in the way:  As an aside, when I was considering buying a new sewing machine a few years ago, I took the time to try out several top-end models across a range of brands including: Janome, Bernina, Husqvarna and Pfaff. &#8220;Backwards&#8221; sewing was an exercise I sampled on all of the machines and none of the models did this well. In the end, I kept going with my Bernina 150QE. If you have better success with &#8220;backwards&#8221; stitching on your machine, I would be interested to know your secret. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I won&#8217;t give you a blow-by-blow analysis of my time-keeping results to date. Suffice to say that, quite predictably, actual quilting time has been minimal and then not especially productive. For example, believe it or not, this is all I have to show for 7+hours of quilting on Sunrise-Sunset:  Whereas for Unplugged! I used quilted the lines with a free-motion quilting foot with the feed dogs up, for this quilt I am using the walking foot as I am looking for straighter lines. It has worked well in the centre where there are longer lines of quilting, although I could have perhaps saved myself the bother and just used corduroy for the piecing:  The hatching in the background is less successfully executed. As Lisa Call points out, stopping and turning corners is a painstaking process. It would be easier if my machine had a better &#8220;backwards&#8221; mode. However, the stitch formation when going &#8220;backwards&#8221; is not as tidy and I can&#8217;t see where I am going as the bulk of the walking foot attachment gets in the way:  As an aside, when I was considering buying a new sewing machine a few years ago, I took the time to try out several top-end models across a range of brands including: Janome, Bernina, Husqvarna and Pfaff. &#8220;Backwards&#8221; sewing was an exercise I sampled on all of the machines and none of the models did this well. In the end, I kept going with my Bernina 150QE. If you have better success with &#8220;backwards&#8221; stitching on your machine, I would be interested to know your secret. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://serendipitypatchwork.com.au/blog/2006/10/31/more-unplugged/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-373</guid>
		<description>I love how you quilted this!   I know there's Melody Johnson out there saying we can quilt too much, but I personally like heavy thread embellishment! It adds so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how you quilted this!   I know there&#8217;s Melody Johnson out there saying we can quilt too much, but I personally like heavy thread embellishment! It adds so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Conway</title>
		<link>http://serendipitypatchwork.com.au/blog/2006/10/31/more-unplugged/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Conway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-374</guid>
		<description>I can see the Nancy Crow influence in this yet it is certainly not a copy of her stuff. Very quirky! (That's a compliment). The quilting looks very time consuming. What size is the finished piece?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the Nancy Crow influence in this yet it is certainly not a copy of her stuff. Very quirky! (That&#8217;s a compliment). The quilting looks very time consuming. What size is the finished piece?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
